Top Cappers on betvega

Trev Rogers

Trev Rogers

#1 RANKED FOOTBALL HANDICAPPER - 3 Years Running!

Free Picks Podcast
Steve Merril

Steve Merril

Steve Merril currently #5 ranked all sports capper for 2014!

Jimmy Boyd

Jimmy Boyd

$1,000 Players Are Up Over $32,600 YTD!

Jack Jones

Jack Jones

Jack is the No. 4 Ranked Overall Handicapper on BetVega in 2014!

NCAA Tournament First Round Historical Trends & Betting Tips

We are now just days away from the start of the 2011 NCAA Basketball Tournament, so we went back and analyzed how each seed has done in the first round over the last 10 years.



Play-in Game Trends

We also took a look at the play-in games since 2001, which in the past has been just one game on the Tuesday of the first week between the 64th and 65th seeds in the entire tournament. With the field expanding to 68 teams this year though, there are now four play-in games on Tuesday and Wednesday.

The favorites have gone 6-4 straight up in the play-in games the last 10 years, but they are just 4-5-1 against the spread with a slim average winning margin of +2.4 points. Now the play-in winners have never gone on to win in the main bracket of 64 teams, but they have gone a respectable 4-6 ATS vs. the top seeds.



Top Seeds Only 52% ATS

Most people know that a one seed has never lost outright in the first round of the NCAA Tournament, and the average winning margin for the 40 top seed winners over the last 10 years has been +26.4 points. However, the top seeds are only 20-18-2, 52.6 percent ATS in Round One obviously due to inflated lines. The closest call for a one seed the last 10 years came when the Pittsburgh Panthers defeated East Tennessee State by 10 points in 2009.



#2 Seeds 45% ATS L10 Years

Two seeds are 39-1 straight up in the first round the past decade, with the only loser coming when Hampton shocked Iowa State back in 2001. The two seeds have been worse bets than the one seeds in Round One, going 18-22, 45.0 percent ATS despite a good average winning margin of +15.8 points. Besides Iowa State’s loss, the narrowest escape by a two seed came in a one-point win by Duke over Belmont in 2008 where the Blue Devils had to overcome a double-digit second half deficit.




$5 Million Bracket Contest - Free $250 Tournament BetExpert Picks




#3 Seeds 37-3 L10 Years

Three seeds are 37-3 straight up in the first round with an average winning margin of +10.7 points, bringing the overall record of the top three seeds to 116-4 straight up the last 10 years. Take note that the third three seed to lose in the first round was Georgetown last season, when the Hoyas were run out of the building by the Ohio Bobcats 97-83. Still, three seeds have held their own vs. the number, going 21-18-1, 53.8 percent ATS.



#4 Seeds Upset Targets

The four seeds are a good place to start when looking for first round upsets, as they have double-digit losses at 30-10 straight up since 2001 with an average winning margin of +8.3 points. They are barely over .500 ATS in Round One at 21-19, 52.5 percent, with two of the ATS losses coming last season when Vanderbilt lost outright to Murray State and Wisconsin barely beat Wofford.



Potential First Round Best Bets

The five seeds have been the most vulnerable to upsets, going only 23-17 straight up in the first round since 2001 with an average winning margin of +4.2 points while going 19-21 ATS. The most recent upset was Cornell over Temple last year.

In other notable first round trends, the seven seeds have been the best bet the last 10 years going 24-16, 60.0 percent ATS and the nine seeds have gone 21-19 straight up over the eight seeds.



Mike Rose

Mike Rose

MIke Rose is a leading sports writer for top sports betting news websites across the internet. Feel free to follow him at http://twitter.com/MikeRose77 and Google+ .

About Mike Rose

MIke Rose is a leading sports writer for top sports betting news websites across the internet. Feel free to follow him at http://twitter.com/MikeRose77 and Google+ .

  • G Man

    1)” However, the top seeds are only 20-18-2, 52.6 percent ” huh? at -110 that is ahead money.
    2) “They are barely over .500 ATS in Round One at 21-19, 52.5 percent,” huh? at -110 that is ahead money.
    3) ” The two seeds have been worse bets than the one seeds in Round One, going 18-22, 45.0 percent ATS despite a good average winning margin of +15.8 points” contrary play. the underdog is 55.00 ATS. Sounds like a good play. Especially when well I keep that for myself…

  • G Man

    1)” However, the top seeds are only 20-18-2, 52.6 percent ” huh? at -110 that is ahead money.
    2) “They are barely over .500 ATS in Round One at 21-19, 52.5 percent,” huh? at -110 that is ahead money.
    3) ” The two seeds have been worse bets than the one seeds in Round One, going 18-22, 45.0 percent ATS despite a good average winning margin of +15.8 points” contrary play. the underdog is 55.00 ATS. Sounds like a good play. Especially when well I keep that for myself…

  • Trev Rogers

    GMAN: We are not saying that they did not make money for bettors……we just feel that the average bettor may be surprised that the ATS performance for top seeds is not that great.

    Thanks for commenting!!

    -Trev

  • Trev Rogers

    GMAN: We are not saying that they did not make money for bettors……we just feel that the average bettor may be surprised that the ATS performance for top seeds is not that great.

    Thanks for commenting!!

    -Trev

star Recent handicapping champs star

bonus

CLICK HERE TO CLAIM YOUR FREE $250 BONUS

Mike Rose

Mike Rose

MIke Rose is a leading sports writer for top sports betting news websites across the internet. Feel free to follow him at http://twitter.com/MikeRose77 and Google+ .